IndexingWins.com

 

discovering why index investing is superior  
Home   Why Indexing?   Indexing FAQs   Resources   Search  
1. Why indexing? | 2. Inside an index | 3. Evidence it works | 4. Making the choice

[Home]
[1. Why indexing?]
[2. Inside an index]
[3. Evidence it works]
[4. Making the choice]



 

Passive Investment Strategies Make $ense.

Life is full of uncertainty and so is the stock market. You can reduce market risk and save on costs by indexing.

 

 

Quick Resources

[FAQs - Index investing]
[Video Interviews]
[Library - Suggested reading]
[Links - Web site resources]

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter



 


   

Isn’t it true that indexing only works for U.S. large company stocks?
No. Indexing works well in all asset classes. Passive investors will actually incur less transaction costs, even given the reduced liquidity of small companies or emerging country stocks; in part because of less turnover. It is very difficult to beat a passive strategy.

 

I don’t believe in the efficient market hypothesis. Why would I index?
Costs, costs, and costs. Don’t believe that in “less efficient” markets, active managers can provide investors with superior returns. In fact, it is harder for them, due to less liquidity and higher transaction costs. The results speak for themselves: passive investors still have the edge. (See Standard & Poor’s Indices Versus Active (SPIVA) Funds Scorecard)

 

What about active managers who have beat the market over many years?  Statistically speaking, it is to be expected that some active managers will beat the market, even by a significant margin. However, active managers consistently show the tendency to "regress" or become average. Too often, any “outperformance” measured against the S&P 500 can be explained by their exposure to a particular asset class, not superior stock choice. If you use a more appropriate index, such as small company or value, their seemingly superior performance disappears.

 

Index funds provide no protection in market downturns. Why would I use one?  Because no one knows in advance the best time to get out of stocks - or back in. In fact, recent mutual fund data clearly shows that active managers have not been able to add value in down markets either. Reducing internal cost, having an appropriate asset allocation among dissimilar asset classes, and periodic portfolio rebalancing, is the far better solution for handling market downturns and taking advantage of subsequent recovery.

 

Isn’t index investing just another new theory? I’ve heard data doesn’t support it. Not at all. Indexing has been used for several decades now. The evidence in favor of a passive strategy is actually so overwhelming, that the burden of proof rests with traditional active managers to justify their contribution in view of their higher costs and greater uncertainties. After looking at all the facts, the shrewd investor recognizes that there is no other conclusion: indexing wins!

 

 

To contact us:

For questions or comments about this web site, its content, or to report viewing problems:

learnmore@indexingwins.com

 

 

Bookmark and Share

[1. Why indexing?] [2. Inside an index] [3. Evidence it works] [4. Making the choice]

 

 
© Copyright 2009-2010 IndexingWins.Com. All rights reserved.    Legal / Privacy